/data/photo/2018/02/21/2945031522.jpeg) |
| Illustration: kompas.com |
Evolution of Language: Homo Erectus and the Origins of Speech
The ability to communicate verbally and symbolically is a defining characteristic that sets humans apart from other animals. Language enables us to convey abstract ideas, collaborate in large groups, build cultures, and pass down knowledge across generations. However, a major question that remains a scientific mystery to this day is: when did the first emergence of verbal and symbolic communication occur in human evolution?Many experts agree that Neanderthals likely had language. But for older human species—especially those predating Neanderthals—the picture becomes much blurrier. A new study proposes something quite bold: Homo erectus, an extinct human ancestor, most likely had speech capabilities—even as far back as around 2 million years ago. The study suggests that Homo erectus possessed "all the tools" necessary for speech and language, drawing evidence from anatomy, genetics, and archaeology.
The Enlargement of the Homo Erectus Brain: A Clue to the "Language Machine"
One foundation of the researchers' argument is the development of the Homo erectus brain. They write that Homo erectus was the first Homo species to experience significant brain enlargement. Interestingly, some parts of the brain often associated with high-level cognitive abilities—such as the frontal and parietal lobes—were said to have morphological similarities to the modern human brain. This does not definitively prove that Homo erectus spoke like us, but it signals that they may have had a cognitive capacity advanced enough to support language.
The Acheulean Stone Tool Technology: Learning, Teaching, and Perhaps... Speaking?
From an archaeological perspective, Homo erectus is known to have used more advanced stone tools, the Acheulean tradition, rather than simpler implements like the Oldowan. Crafting Acheulean tools typically requires the ability to conceptualize the final shape of the tool, master non-instantaneous manufacturing techniques, learn from others, and—most importantly for this study—possibility of teaching these techniques to others. The researchers argue that such learning-teaching processes are greatly aided, or even necessitated, by abstract thinking and symbolic communication. In other words, the complexity of tools could be a mirror of the complexity of the mind—and perhaps also of language.